Public safety debates in Latin America are too often framed as a false dilemma: being either tough on crime or lenient on offenders. This polarized narrative obscures the reality that effective strategies must combine the urgency of enforcement with the staying power of prevention and justice. Neighbors, facing persistent fear and political leaders constrained by short-term cycles, might be naturally drawn to repressive approaches such as El Salvador’s current state of exception.
These measures have produced rapid and widely felt reductions in crime, helping many families recover a concrete sense of safety. For people living under daily insecurity, these immediate results are tangible while democratic guarantees can feel abstract or slow. Yet the approach has come at the cost of due process, institutional trust, and fundamental rights, jeopardizing the integrity of democratic systems. The lesson is not to weaken rights but to build the delivery capacity that makes safety possible without abandoning them.
This document provides evidence and narrative guidance to support a balanced and integrated approach that recognizes the political appeal of mano dura while also presenting evidence of its limits. By contrast, strategies that integrate law enforcement, justice systems, and social prevention deliver both immediate relief and durable security. The communications challenge is to move beyond polarized frames and equip city leaders with narratives that resonate with public concerns while advancing
smarter, democratic solutions.
Drawing on global research and practice, the guide highlights four evidence-based principles:
- Target interventions on the people, places, and
behaviors most associated with violence. - Strengthen community institutions that prevent and
mediate conflict. - Build legitimacy through fairness, transparency, and
respect in policing and justice. - Improve safety through strategic visible environmental
design changes.